Sunday, April 20, 2014

Enshrining good working relations between law enforcers and human rights institutions

By Elias Mhegera
A landmark achievement has been reached in the democratic frontier in the Tanzanian governance arena after a recent agreement between the Police Force and human rights NGOs, under their umbrella body the Tanzania Human Rights Defenders Coalition (THRDC).
The meeting between the THRDC and the Police Force on Thursday last week came as a development after the willingness that was shown by the Deputy Inspector of General of Police Force (DIGP), Abdulrahman Kaniki in November 26, 2013 when he was invited to represent the Force in a public event that was organized by the former.
Thereafter this was followed one day seminar on February 27 at the New Africa Hotel in Dar es Salaam, where more than 30 senior Police Officer including Regional Police Commander (RPCs), from both Mainland Tanzania and the Isles, attended.
This turned out to be an opening to new relationship between the Force and the Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) if the promises were to be kept. It was realized that the communication gap has created unfounded mistrusts which now the two parties have decided to resolve. 
It was after speeches by the DIGP, and the THRDC board member who is well the executive director of the Legal and Human Rights Centre (LHRC), Dr Helen Kijo-Bisimba when there was an enshrining of emotional reactions from the some Police officials who were categorical that they have never been treated fairly by the Human Rights NGOs (HRNGOs).  
Talking about the challenges that Human Rights Defenders (HRDs) are facing it was the National Coordinator of the THRDC Onesmo Olengurumwa who said that depending on the nature of their activities and geographical locations, HRDs face a number of challenges.
It is during their operations when their either co-operate or at times even clash with the Police Force. For instance, women defenders have been facing problems from a segment of conservatives who view introduction of gender equity and campaigns against domestic violence as attempts to imitate foreign cultures as instigation of matrimonial conflicts.
For that matter, HRDs in these areas as the survey by the THRDC indicated, and the most recent survey by Tanzania Media Women Association (TAMWA), in Zanzibar and Musoma are in risky situations.

In other cases it is those who are dealing with governance and financial accountability in the Local Government Authorities (LGAs) this can be journalists or NGOs which are conducting Public Expenditure Surveys (PETS). Another group is those who are championing for environmental and land rights this is because of land grabbing, land based conflicts and environmental degradation due to mining activities.

As it has been occurring in many occasions, whenever HRDs want to make follow up in violations of human rights usually there is a cooperation between human rights activists, journalists and other stakeholders, this is in many cases have had devastative effects.
In most cases they are rounded, beaten, arbitrarily arrested, and even their communication equipment like cameras and lap top are destroyed. These harassments, co notates that HRDs are hindered to inform the public while at times this goes hand in hand with repeated hatred statements from Government ministers as it was with the immediate former Tourism Minister Hamis Kagasheki against NGOs in Loliondo. 
Whenever there are challenging situations like this very few HRDs can continue to work effectively, as a big number of them are scared. To a large extent that is why the HRDs are struggling in order to ensure that the Constitutional Assembly is to formulate laws that are supportive towards the freedom and access to information.
Although there have been constant denials every now and then, but HRDs are always entangled and they become victims of power abuse by the power mighty like the regional and district commissioners, police commanders, and even with The Tanzania People's Defence Force (TPDF) soldiers as it was with gas commotions in Mtwara.
In other words HRDs are facing challenges not from a single direction as some of them are from the community itself and at times from the Government functionaries. 
“The current economic and political contexts in this Country are not friendly and they need a thorough review if HRDs were to implement their working strategies without frequent interruptions” warned Olengurumwa.  
The Coalition demands for established security strategies and resolutions and invites other stakeholders to be part of the general platform for change in the governance structure of the NGOs. As it has been occurring many times there is a tendency to perceive HRDs as being agents of the opposition.

These kinds of perceptions are promulgated by a segment of political leaders knowingly or unknowingly due to lack of understanding how the systems of separation of power and transparency work in democratic societies. In Tanzania anyone who criticizes poor performance in any area of the Government is regarded as an agent of the opposition or foreign elements.
It was the Mwanza’s Regional Police Commander (RPC), SACP-Valentino Mlowola who started it all when he lamented, “you have been tantalizing the Police Force through the media, this is very unfair we are also human rights defenders just like you,” he lamented.
His reaction followed statements that the Police Force has been part of the gross violation of human rights in Tanzania. His cry as a defensive mechanism even before a presentation was made was an indication that some bigwigs in the Force are never prepared for criticism.
But this does not mean that he did not have supporters in the hall. Arusha’s RPC Liberatus Sabas suggested that whenever HRNGOs discusses human rights issues in this country they should have in mind that Police Officers are also human beings. “You should treat us as human beings as well” he added to the cry from the law enforcers’ commanders.
However he appreciated the fact that the HRDs trough the THRDC has opened a discussion forum. “I advice that we produce documents that will be shared in order to improve working relations, but also for imparting human rights knowledge to law enforcers” he commented. 
This stance was also echoed by other colleagues in the Force as well. Ahmed Msangi Mbeya RPC’s went further and said that at time human rights defenders HRDs work as a supporting hand to the opposition, and that he was annoyed by their demonstration during the doctors’ strike in February 2012.
But it was not all differences at the session, as jokes also increased the fragrance at times. For instance Judge (rtd) Thomas Mihayo was cornered by the gigantic commanders of Paul Chagonja’s like, due to one TV jingo where he condemns violation of human rights by state organs, where his answer was simple “I do not mean all Police Officers are violators of human rights,” he defended.
Probably it was Mr Jesse James, lecturer Law School University of Dar es Dar es Salaam, who enlightened the commanders that their violation of human rights was implicit. “This is after a failure to balance between rights and responsibilities” he commented.
Elaborating further he disclosed Police officials are not cushioned from the International Criminal Court Statute or the Rome Statute and they can face prosecutions even after their retirements.  He reminded them that the legality of international mechanisms against them stems from the fact that Tanzania has ratified various international protocols on human rights.
“we should tread carefully in our operations lest we find ourselves facing charges in the African Court of Human and Peoples’ Rights (ACHPR)”, he warned. As the knowledge was passing over one could tell that Police brutality is partly contributed by lack of knowledge on human rights.
Main discussions and reactions
During discussions it was realized that some officials from the Force do not understand the role of CSOs in fulfilling the principles of separation of power. However, to this rescue were seasoned and probably much more exposed officials in the name of Zelothe Stephen and Suleiman Kova who admitted that there is no way the Police Force can sideline HRNGOs and journalists being in the family of HRDs. 
For his part Kova said that his Force has had a good working relation with journalists which has facilitated a lot in the community policing zeal. He also lauded the HRNGOs because they are defenders of the citizenry at large, but called for more formal communication between these parties rather than outbursts through the media.
Adding to this debate Stephen said that if the Police Force, HRNGOs and the media were to work in good relations there would be tremendous improvement in the social welfare since the main motive of ensuring security is to create an enabling environment for the citizenry and other residents in this country to produce peacefully without any fear of unpredictable intrusions.
Conclusions and recommendations
Eventually it was decided that there must be a formulation of a new mechanism which will assist the Police Force to maintain peace but without sacrificing their vital role of protecting security, in order to remove assumptions that this Force is an armed wing of the ruling Chama Cha Mapinduzi (CCM) as it has been claimed several times in various political circles.
The Police Force promised that it will convene internal meetings and redefine its position in a new multiparty era where politicians have been at the centre of their daily operations.
“It is true there is a need to find what we can do with the executive, the legislature and even the judiciary, but our main problem has been political tug-of-wars” said Paul Chagonja a senior official in the Force who also heads special operations and training.
For this matter he suggests that NGOs should be intermediaries between these bodies and reminding them that national welfare should be given priority rather than intrinsic political divisiveness which now has at times put this Force in jeopardy.
In the working document for these organizations the Police Force will put forth its suggestions, and then the knowledge will be disseminated up to the grassroots level. It was also suggested the Force and CSOs should prepare joint media campaigns and education sessions which will enlighten the citizenry their role in maintaining peace and tranquility.
There will be engagement sessions between the Force and politicians in order to chart out working mechanisms and avoid unnecessary commotions as it has been the tradition previously. The media and HRNGOs were counseled to get enough information from the Force before they rush to the media for any utterances.
The dissemination of education on human rights should be expanded gradually within and without the Force in order to make law enforcers work more professionally but also the citizenry to understand their responsibility in maintaining peace and order.
Protection of human rights should go beyond the traditional understanding where law enforcers are only perceived as violators of human rights. In other words exchange of mutual trust should reduce the existing mutual suspicions between HRNGOs and the Police Force.
The Police Force promised to institutionalize a focal person on human rights in order to maintain regular communications between the Police Force and the CSOs.
“From now onwards I believe we have opened a new working chapter, we do not expect outbursts in the media, and we promise that all the deliberations will be worked upon” said a jubilant Chagonja when giving the closing remarks at this seminar.
Photo
Inspector General of Police

Ernest Mangu

Fables of the constitution making process in Tanzania…

Published on: Sunday, March 2nd, 2014
 By Elias Mhegera – There are many questions surrounding the attempt by the ruling Chama Cha Mapinduzi (CCM) to quash second draft of the New Constitution Bill which is currently under the special Constituent Assembly in Dodoma central Tanzania, for tabling.
Special voices in the debate
Judge (rtd) Amir Manento-Chairman of the Commission for Human Rights and Good Governance (CHRAGG), he is pro a three-tier Government
Prof Josephat Kanywanyi; warns that the three-tier Government will weaken the Union
Law Professor Chris Peter Maina he is pro-three-tier Government
Earlier there was much ecstasy with the coming of this second draft, but the appointment of some party stalwarts of the CCM did signal that there is an attempt to manipulate the process, and there are reasons for this, analysts now say.
Although it is difficult to come up with clear answers but one can construe the whole meaning of this through the tug of war particularly on the nature of the Union. Although there are many good proposals in the Bill, but now the whole discussion has drawn attention to either two or three-tier Governments.
This has now been echoed in various circles, starting from civil society organizations (CSOs), the Pentecostal Churches of Tanzania (PCT) and the public at large. CCM as a party is openly supporting the two-tier Government, opposition parties are pro-three tier Government.
The main claim is that the Warioba Commission also known as the Constitutional Review Commission (CRC) had adhered, to a large extent, to the people’s wishes of formulating their own constitution, but some politicians have been trying to reduce the entire process to their vested interests.
One assumption is, if the new three-tier structure is to be applied then it would be easy to remove the CCM from power. It is argued that it is because of this reason that the Tanzanian Government is forcing all political parties to fall within all the two parts of the Union, Mainland Tanzania and in the Isles.
But for the Catholic Church followers the matter is bit complicated because its’ top most leader in Tanzania Polycarp Cardinal Pengo, Archbishop of the Archdiocese of Dar es Salaam, said it categorically that those supporting a three-tier government were tired of the Union and ‘selfish.’
Implicitly he was representing the RC’s stance where the Union matter is concerned, but this does not mean that he commands an overwhelming support in this matter from all his followers.
The point is, the question of whether to continue with the current structure two-tier of the Union is not conclusive in itself if one was to analyze it in line with party affiliations or religious inclinations. There are Muslims from the Mainland who support a two tier, likewise those who support a three-tier structure.
There are Muslims from the Isles who support the two-tier, but a big number (if not all) supporters of the Civic United Front (CUF) supports a three-tier Government but under special contracts. Sympathizers of the CUF have been complaining in many occasions that the Union Government has been assisting its wing in the Isles to win against their presidential president Maalim Seif Shariff Hamad who has gone in the race four times.
For them now it is the time to escape ‘colonization’ of the Mainland through the Union. So although supporters of the three tier are found from the two sides of the Union but their reasons are quite diverse and not necessarily of the same nature.
Deus Kibamba –holding the 1977 United Republic of Tanzania Constitution, Chairman of the CSOs –Jukwaa la Katiba (JUKATA) i.e. Constitutional Forum, he is pro-three-tier Government just like many leaders of the CSOs in Mainland Tanzania
Deus Kibamba –holding the 1977 United Republic of Tanzania Constitution, Chairman of the CSOs –Jukwaa la Katiba (JUKATA) i.e. Constitutional Forum, he is pro-three-tier Government just like many leaders of the CSOs in Mainland Tanzania
This was revealed during a recent debate by one seasoned academician who is a supporter of the three-tier Government, as he is quoted here; “It is for the first time that Tanzanians are going to have a constitution of their own after having been subjected to ‘borrowed’ constitutions for a long time,” said a senior law lecturer Prof. Chris Peter Maina, who also support  a three-tier Government.
The don said this at the Ubungo Plaza where he was a discussant at one of the constitutional forums – jointly convened by the Konrad Adenaur Stiftung (KAS) and the Tanzania Development Initiative Programme (TADIP) early this month of February 2014. Similar statements have been made in other meetings.
Julius Nyerere mixing soils of Tanganyika and Zanzibar symbolizing the Union
Julius Nyerere mixing soils of Tanganyika and Zanzibar symbolizing the Union
Probably one of the main consolations to sympathizers if the three-tier Government was when the Chairman of the Commission for Human Rights and Good Governance (CHRAGG) stated openly that he supports the three-tier form of Government, “you can quote me anywhere, I am for three-tier Government,” he boldly affirmed.
On January 31, for instance, the Chairman of the Constitution Forum, Mr. Deus Kibamba, also listed a number of demands from civil society which had since been accommodated in the new Draft Bill, saying: “We are heading towards a positive democratic transition.” He was addressing a well attended meeting at the New Africa Hotel Hall.
Again, this forum was orgnaised by the Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, (FES), the Constitutional Forum well known for its Kiswahili name Jukwaa la Katiba (JUKATA), and the Konrad Adaneur Stiftung which drew experts who were keen on disseminating good knowledge in the formulation of the new constitution after having discussed it thoroughly.
Julius Nyerere and Abeid Karume signing the Articles of the Union
Julius Nyerere and Abeid Karume signing the Articles of the Union
During the opening speeches, the two resident directors of the KAS, Stefan Reith and Rolf Paasch, called on civil societies to play an active role in empowering the Constitutional Assembly, and eventually the general public,  to get ready for the referendum sometimes later this year.
Already, there are lots of public expectations against the backdrop of political interests. “I can predict that three things will draw significant attention, namely, the nature of the Union, natural resources, and the consequences of all these to the local government authorities in the future,” Kibamba said.
Kibamba also warned that despite apparent jubilation at the rebirth of a Tanganyika government in line with the three-tier recommendations, this could possibly weaken the United Republic of Tanzania as a sovereign state.
Analysts also project that the Warioba Commission had reflected more on a three-tier government and, if not possible, the whole process would have to be delayed because of the structural setbacks.
Although experts insist that discussions focus on yet unspecified ‘pertinent’ issues rather than the nature of the Union, all attention seems to have been directed at “the Union matter”  and this was reflected by reactions from the 201 members that were appointed by President Jakaya Kikwete and their names were announced on February 8th, 2014.
For instance, a board member of the Tanzania Constitutional Forum (TCF), Mr Hebron Mwakagenda, raised concerns that some of the appointees do not belong to the civil society  and that they had been appointed in order to foster the ruling party’s agenda  the two-tier government which has been a big source of commotion between the opposition parties and CCM.
But the National Coordinator of the Tanzania Human Rights Defenders Coalition (THRDC), Mr Onesmo Ole Ngurumwa, also raised similar concerns that human rights activists had been sidelined.
“It has come as a surprise to us … when strong human rights NGOs like the Legal and Human Rights Centre have been sidelined … this is a political agenda,” he told a news conference that was organized by the TCF.
The mayhem of the CSOs and a sect of the PCT tells that the draft Bill might have been exhaustive and promising but the process of formulating a new constitution might be flawed mid-way. Ms Gemma Akilimali, representing women interests at the debate, agreed that the new constitution was promising and that women issues were adequately addressed.
She said through the Women Coalition on Constitution (WCC) they had worked hard to ensure gender equity in keeping with global protocols to which Tanzania was a signatory.
“We have formed a good team … drawn from … the Legal and Human Rights Centre (LHRC), the Tanzania Gender Networking Programme (TGNP), Women’s Legal Aid Centre (WLAC), Tanzania Women Lawyers Association (TAWLA) and other stakeholders … the trend is promising so far,” she commented.
Ms Rahma Bajun from the Tanzania Youth Coalition agrees, saying that most of the demands from the youth had been accommodated in the second draft of the Bill.
“One of the most startling was a clause on the age of potential legislators … the first Bill had risen to 26 … this one has gone back to 21 years, this is a positive development,” she affirmed.
Moses Kulaba, Executive Director of Agenda Participation 2000, approves most of the items of new draft Bill, but is worried as to whether the new constitution will come with strong anti-corruption mechanisms.
Also he cherishes that it is clearly stated that the new constitution will be supreme where Union matters are concerned.
“I am happy that this is clearly explained but the task will be for the two governments in the federation, that of Mainland Tanzania regardless of its new name, and that of Zanzibar to reflect these new developments, otherwise it was so confusing particularly after the formulation of the Zanzibar Constitution in 2010,” he remarked.
Prof. emeritus Josephat Kanywanyi of the University of Dar es Salaam raises issues in Chapter 17 of the Bill. “I am worried that the spirit behind many discussions on this chapter is not to strengthen the Union, but to go separate ways,” he warned.
The elderly professor suggested that the debates should have focused on how to reduce or remove altogether the imbalances of the 50 years Union. It is this stance that was once shared by Cardinal Pengo
This strong statement could have probably been received as ‘good news’ by some ruling CCM stalwarts where many analysts have since been identified as the main propagators of the two-tier government — which many of the young people now active in the current politics do not share!
But while this remained a strong position of mainstream CCM stakeholders, the main opposition party Chama cha Demokrasia na Maendeleo (CHADEMA) is for a three-tier government, while another strong opposition particularly in the isles, the Civic United Front (CUF), as mentioned earlier, supports the three-tier government   but under what it calls ‘special contracts.’
“I am totally convinced that the three-tier government will weaken the Union … this will have severe repercussions even in the working of the new constitution itself,” remarked a renowned academic.
Narrating the long history of the Union, he said that it was wrong to assess the Union within the context of happenings in 1964 but from ‘the commonality of a number of issues prior to that.’
He chose his words carefully, knowing that a good number of participants inside the hall supported the three-tier system of government.
He suggested that even if the new Union were to follow this new formula, there would be a need for thorough discussions along it.
“I know for sure that the Union did not survive simply because there were general acceptances on issues, but also partly because Mainland Tanzania (Tanganyika) had projected the supremacy of the Union than the shortcomings,” he argued.
These statements  from Prof Kanywanyi  which attracted a considerable attention given his age, experience and exposure reminded the audience of what the founding father of Tanzania, Mwalimu Julius Nyerere once warned that once the Union between Tanganyika and Zanzibar is over there could be a breakaway of Pemba from Unguja as well as a spill-over effect.
Similar statements were also once made by the Second Phase President Ali Hassan Mwinyi, the Third Phase President Benjamin Mkapa and even the incumbent Premier Peter Pinda. One can predict that these warnings are an indication that the three-tier government much as it is being celebrated in the Mainland, is just a lee-way to the total crumble of the Union.
So defenders of the Union as it is, or with minor modifications, might be differing on their vested interests, but they can be as well sharing the final results of a demised Union.
For instance it has been discussed in many circles that a lot of issues surrounding the Union are never discussed openly. While in 1964 the possible reasons could have been containing “Communism” as it has been reported so many times, but also it was to cushion the new Zanzibar regime from a possible ‘counter-coup’ from the deposed Sultan Jamshid bin Abdullah.
Read more at: http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/4288980?uid=3739224&uid=2&uid=4&sid=21103425890591
But reading from the current political development if Zanzibar was to assume supremacy then this will entail assuming some powers which are firmly withheld in the Union fabric particularly foreign affairs matters. Zanzibar’s sovereignty will definitely wipe out Christianity in the two islands.
Attempts to join the Organization of Islamic Conference (OIC) on the part of Zanzibar have been quashed twice on grounds of the supremacy of the Union Constitution which is explicit in the Article 19, of the Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania, that Tanzania is a secular state.
Hence the worrisome attitude by the Roman Catholic head in Tanzania, are compounded within attempts by Zanzibar’s attempt to join the OIC, and this does not go without explanation of the “fear of the unknown” read more at: http://www.zenit.org/en/articles/is-tanzania-the-next-target-for-radical-islam
However even within the new constitution, Union matters have retained the same test concerning joining international organizations as it is well stipulated in the Montevideo Convention, on the Rights and Duties of States, agreement signed at Montevideo, Uruguay, on December 26, 1933.
Thus the Union matter is crucial in determining the new Tanzania as enshrined in the ongoing debates. When he was interviewed by The Guardian on Sunday exclusively, retired lecturer from the Philosophy Department of the University of Dar es Salaam Dr Azaveli Lwaitama had this to say, “There are shared interests between the Zanzibar CCM supporters and their counterparts from the Mainland no wonder the appointments of members of the constituent assembly had reflected these hidden interests”.
For him therefore there will be a lot of manipulations in order to ensure that the three-tier structure is quashed or the whole process of the formulation of the new constitution is facing snags altogether. These assumptions from the don are shared again by Olengurumwa from the THRDC.
He had this to say when he was contacted for comments, “It is apparent that CCM’s interest will prevail in this process, this can be detected through such appointments of ‘their’ stalwarts Kingunge Ngombale Mwiru, and Paul Kimiti, these are former Cabinet Ministers and they do not belong to the CSOs, their subsequent penetration leaves a lot to be desired,” he commented.
He further mentioned some  CCM cadres who have been appointed to fulfill this desire as Abdallah Bulembo, Paul Makonda and many others whose appointments he claims has been done much to the detriment of the citizenry and for the benefits of the CCM.
This stance is shared by Hebron Mwakageda a staunch member of the CSOs and current CEO of the Tanzania Coalition on Debt and Development (TCDD) who says that he has never seen Mzee Kingunge in the CSOs for the past 20 years and his sudden emergence there as their representative is a serious joke.
But speaking on Zanzibar’s contribution through the Zanzibar Legal Services Centre (ZLSC), was Jasad Bungala who says the main interests of Zanzibar in the process, at least from the CSOs was recognition of Zanzibar’s contribution to the Union Government, rectification of certain clauses’ in foreign affair matters, and the Union  Presidency.
Moreover, he mentioned other aspects as the need to have an independent government from the Mainland so that it can be conjoined with Zanzibar in forming the Union Government. He also advanced that all borders including those in the ocean must be clearly explained in the new Union constitution.
Probably these demands from Zanzibar can be explained within the framework of what have been termed several times as “kero za Muungano” (Union nuisances) particularly from the Zanzibar side.
To mention a few of those it is the question of the presidency which Zanzibari’s says it should be switched in turns that once the president from the Mainland completes his tenure they should be automatically succeeded by one from the isles.
In this particular note the incumbent President Jakaya Kikwete from the mainland Tanzania had succeeded Benjamin Mkapa also from the same side of the Union. While in regard to Union borders there have been a claim that Tanzania Mainland is to extract some minerals and gases which belongs to the Zanzibar waters and therefore in the process trespassing the Articles of the Union.
In this bid there have been many campaigns covertly and openly that the Union was imposed in order to suppress Islam as a dominant religion in Zanzibar, as well as to ‘steal’ natural resources from Zanzibar including oil and gas.
In May 2006 it was reported in the media that ten Zanzibaris had filed a case against the mainland over the Tanzania Union agreement and the Coastal Strip, they also sued their Attorney General and the Secretary General of the House of Representatives over the Isles’ loss of its seat in the United Nations.
Others sued include the secretary general of the ruling Chama cha Mapinduzi (CCM) and the Speaker of the House of Representatives for “colluding to infringe Zanzibar’s sovereignty.
“Therefore if one was to reflect the demands by the ZLSC they were replica of these long upheld demands of a Union framework which undermines Zanzibar’s political hegemony.
While the demands are still hot in many circles, the media has been reminded its vital role of amplifying this debate and set the national agenda for the sake of acquiring a new, table and far reaching constitution according to Prof Maina, when summing up issues at the panel discussion.

So far there has been a lot of lobbying from various circles as there has been a general belief that a certain sect of politicians is there to hijack the new constitution formulation process in their interest.
photo: Deus Kibamba, Chairman of the Tanzania Constitutional Forum well known a Jukwaa la Katiba in Kiswahili, Tanzania's national language 

Constitution making process in Tanzania: students in tertiary institutions shower praises to judge (rtd) Joseph Warioba

By Elias Mhegera
Nation’s attention focused to Dodoma
While the Constituent Assembly (CA) in Dodoma has been adjourned for a while so as to allow its members to go for Easter holidays, the chairman of the now defunct Constitutional Review Commission (CRC) Judge (rtd) Joseph Warioba will be one person to breathe in a sigh of relief to the maximum of enjoyment.
This is after hearing good news from students from tertiary institutions and many other analysts who have come strongly in defense of his team’s draft constitution. This is contrary to what the President of the United Republic of Tanzania (URT) Jakaya Kikwete had done when addressing the CA in Dodoma, central Tanzania.
In March 21, 2014 the Head of State shifted positions from that of the President of the URT to that of the chairman of the ruling Chama Cha Mapinduzi (CCM), which he dubs as top leader in the rank of chairman. He pounded heavily on the Constitutional Review Commission (CRC) retired Premier and Judge, Joseph Warioba whose commission had suggested a three-tier Union.
This act was once done by his immediate predecessor, Former President Benjamin Mkapa in 1998 when retired judge Robert Kisanga had suggested for a three-tier Government structure. Then Head of State was vehement and he even lost temper while discarding Judge Kisanga’s Commission findings that his team had gone beyond the terms of reference.
Earlier  in 1992 former Chief Justice Francis Nyalali had suggested the same, the three-tier structure but the President Ali Hassan Mwinyi was diplomatic enough not to throw any insults to the now deceased Nyalali, although he equally chose to ignore this suggestion but allowed Tanzania to re-introduce multiparty politics in the same year.
In 1984 the Zanzibar’s President Aboud Jumbe who was as well the First Vice President of the URT was forced into a resignation after he had suggested for a three tier structure. He was working under the founding of Tanzania Julius Nyerere who was to voluntarily retire one year later.
At least this has been the brief history of the Union that is now in ten blink of the collapse. This is because Zanzibar came up with its own constitution in 2010 which declares in terms of its sovereignty, which Warioba and his team saw as a main threat to the 50 years Union.
Therefore the suggestion for three-tier was an attempt to retain this union which has gone on with a lot of unsettled nuisances. After Kikwete’s speech there have been a lot of commotions in the CA between two camps, the CCM which supports a two-tier structure and the opposition parties which supports a three-tier structure.
Already representative of three opposition parties namely Chama cha Demokrasia na Maendeleo (CHADEMA), the Civic United Front, and the National Convention for Construction and Reforms (NCCR-Mageuzi) have decided to walk out of the CA promising not to come back in the House.

Their main claims is that they are being bulldozed by the CCM for its interests in the constitution through what analysts have termed as a “tyranny of numbers” since CCM members of the CA forms the majority in the House.
The opposition had earlier formed what it called Umoja wa Katiba ya Wananchi (UKAWA) which can simply be translated as convention of the people’s constitution. But while this is the situation in Dodoma voices in support of the CRC under Warioba have been voiced in so many places.
Strong utterances were made during a one day symposium at the Landmark Hotel in Ubungo on Wednesday this week (April 16, 2014) which was organized in collaboration of the Konrad Adenauer-Stiftung (KAS) and Tanzanian Students Networking Programme (TSNP).
Welcoming the 60 + students at the hall was Alphonce Lusako, Secretary General of the TSNP who said that the role o students is vital in transforming the Tanzanian society and that students have been spending so much time in searching for allowances but they are lagging far behind in the constitutional  making process.
Team leader at the KAS, Richard Shaba discussed the vital role of providing leadership skills that his organization has done since 1964, starting from the Kivukoni College which groomed leaders who maintained ethics and leadership etiquettes but now this is no longer the case with many leaders.
Mr. Shaba said prolonged arguments in Dodoma which have made the Constituent Assembly (CA) to fail to adhere to the scheduled time frame are not based in constructive assessments but rather ideological affiliations.
“I am sad that today violations against the constitution are prevailing so much but previously there were guardians of this constitution as Mwalimu Julius Nyerere did in 1994”. He remarked
He was referring an incident when Ali Hassan Mwinyi then President of the United Republic of Tanzania had allowed Zanzibar under then President Salmin Amour to join the Organization of Islamic Conference (OIC) without prior consultation to the Mainland or the Union Government.
He narrated further that one of the gross violations that has been going on in Tanzania is extrajudicial killings which have been conducted by the law enforcers. He critiqued that in many instances the state has failed many times to guarantee safety of Tanzanians living abroad.
Former Commissioner of the CRC speaks out
For his part the member of the now defunct CRC Humphrey Polepole said that his Commission did a good work in researching and showing dedication to this nation, but he was worried that this document is to be hijacked for certain political interests.
“I call for you the youths of this country to be prepared to defend this nation from corrupt motives. It is true that far way back in 1964 Tanganyika and Zanzibar had equal national status including two chairs in the United Nations and they decided to unite, but I am questioning the motives behind this massive pressure in support of the two-tier Government,” he hinted.
He cherished that the unification process in 1964 came out of the good will between Nyerere and Abeid Karume the slain former leader of Zanzibar. He advanced that the theory was based in a motive to have a strong and united nation in Tanzania that could become more vibrant in the international fora. Moreover Polepole said that Zanzibar constitutes a blend of people from various backgrounds and many are from Mainland Tanzania.
He further narrated that after the Zanzibar independence in 1963 there was a dominance of the Arab through the sultan that was in power. He therefore reveals to the attentive youngsters that there was a fear of a counter coup after the 1964 upsurge that is why Karume sought for unification so; the main concern was security of Zanzibar in the light of a deposed sultan.
“While in the mainland Tanzania (Tanganyika), also Nyerere was concerned of structures of the union namely, whether it should be a unitary, federal or a confederation, but time was not in his side so the motive of guaranteeing security to Zanzibar reined high than the form of the union, at least in those formative years”, commented Polepole.
Implicitly this former commissioner of the CRC wanted to say that the nature of the union that has gone along with so many nuisances needs to be revisited in order to reflect the current international system that is not characterized by cold war, and even to remind that the threats of a counter coup are nonexistent.
For instance, he said, Cameroon had two nations previously of the French and British Cameroon which formed the current Cameroon.  Even Egypt and Syria had once formed a union which later collapsed.
“We should know the fact that Nyerere had retained some colonial Government functionaries that is why these had to be consulted on the nature of the union in its formative years. So the British model was borrowed” he disclosed.  
Polepole said that implicitly, Tanzania had assumed a federal structure but under the union name which could appear as unitary in formation. He suggested that probably what could have befitted in the name was con-federal since these two nations had chosen to unite in some few areas but retain their autonomies in many other areas.

The current Union under scrutiny
He critiqued the current nature of the Union whereby the President of the United Republic of Tanzania cannot even discuss on issues like health or even infrastructure and for that matter even the Minister for Works of the United Republic of Tanzania cannot extend his jurisdiction in Zanzibar.
He highlighted that the High Court of Tanzania cannot resolve Zanzibar issues as according to the Zanzibar constitution of 2010. He also raised a concern that the point of departure started in 1984 where now the name Tanzania isles now became Tanzania Zanzibar.
He discussed on issues like ports and aviation whereby Zanzibar has never recognized the Tanzania Aviation Authority and even the National Examination Council and even the Tanzania Bureau of Standards whereby Zanzibar has its own similar body.
He further urged that one of the things which had affected the political oligarchy is the fact that the CRC had provided for ethics to the leaders. He also narrated that the three-tier structure was not escapable due to the prevailing circumstances.
But also there was a concern from the isles whereby the formation of the most Supreme Court so that all the High Court of Tanzania and that of Zanzibar could be subservient to the Supreme Court of Tanzania. 
But students’ concerns were even clearer during the question and answers session.  Mr Chacha Hatari who claimed that he is unemployed after having graduated for the University of Dar es Salaam (UDSM) asked what was to follow if the two-tier structure of the Union was to be passed in the CA, what will follow? As long as the draft constitution was designed for three tier government.
While Daniel Msolwa a student at the UDSM also raised a concern on the same question if it will be two tier governments what will happen. In response to these questions, Mr Polepole argued that the existence of Zanzibar as an independent entity in the Union structure will deny mainlanders opportunity to decide their fates, while their colleagues from the isles are enjoying this as in accordance with the 2010 Zanzibar’s Constitution.
For his part Kudra Abbas Garula a student at the Mwalimu Nyerere Memorial Academy- asked if at all Tanganyika is to come back will the Union then prevail? In response Polepole said that the re-emergence of Tanganyika was not a big deal as such.
 But some of the provisions were reducing the power of the president in order to enshrine good performance to the best of this nation that is why there is too much commotions which are fueled albeit covertly by some politicians with strong ambitions of becoming future presidents of this country. 
He said that in the USA this has been a common practice to the extent that the parliament has been very supreme than the president but in Tanzania the president is supreme. He said that the CRC had provided more strength to the parliament.
He also gave reasons as to why a single government is impossible. Because the existence of Zanzibar must prevail, this then gave a chance for the CRC to discuss on the efficacy of two or three-tier government. He reminded that the Warioba Commission had even suggested that the Union cannot be broken except for the referendum.
Mesaya Ismail also a student from the UDSM- wanted to know on the right for prisoners to vote, and that primary education should go up to form four.
But he was worried as to whether the new constitution will be formulated due to ideological inclinations; he gave an example that this is what made Kikwete to present his speech as a CCM cadre during his opening speech in Dodoma recently.  
This stance was immediately supported by Michael Legan from the UDSM, he said that he was shocked by President Kikwete’s speech and wanted to know what had caused this change of attitude? Because previously the Head of State had approved the two drafts and has praised the CRC for its good work.
Another student who contributed in the debate was Mr Ado Shaibu from the UDSM –Law School, he said that the structure of the Union itself is not a big deal in maintaining the Union, but systems which have been prepared to protect it. He suggested that sources of the income for the existence of the Union are very important if the Union was to be institutionalized.
Polepole defended his team of the CRC by saying that it had used a purposeful approach by looking at how harmony is maintained between the two sides of the Union.
He as well condemned threats that were made recently by one Minister that this country will be plunged into a war if this country was to allow a three tier government of the re-emergence of Tanganyika.
“I count this is an alert to the soldiers that they should be prepared to take power if any other party was to take power, or that it should use force to crush any movement which is against the status quo which supports the two tier-government structure vehemently”. He recounted.  
One Ms Anne-Maria Kobelo-from St. Joseph College of Engineering and Technology suggested that the new constitution guarantees security of the marginalized group including their education and other life opportunities.
While Gabriel Emmanuel, UDSM student suggested that the best form of the Union should be a single government rather than two or three.  But Kija Kimbu from St Joseph was inquisitive as to why the CRC was not allowed to discuss whether the Union should prevail or not.
Commenting to these stances Polepole said that the draft constitution had maintained all groups including the marginalized ones, and that it is difficult to have a single government because Zanzibar due to its size would like to retain its identity.
Resolutions
Eventually students came up with resolutions that the members of the CA, should be told by the community members at large that what is going on is wastage of time and resources because there a lot of counterproductive arguments.
However, students commended the Warioba Commission for its good job and that eventually it came up with a good document. But they critiqued the CA that it has been overtaken by emotions, and allegations of corruption. They critiqued the process of getting members of the CA that ministers and MPs from the constituencies should have not been used for this purpose.
What next?
There was a call that students from tertiary institutions should register and vote during elections and that all kind of education that they get in any manner should be replicated to the societies at large.
That the CA is now using time adversely, and lavish expenditures of money and that a good number of the available experts are used to fulfill political ambitions implicitly in favour of the ruling Chama Cha Mapinduzi. They condemned unwarranted threats intimidations and bribes
Also they reminded members of the CA, that youngsters have been sidelined in so many ways, so they promised to do what the founding father of this nation Mwalimu Nyerere did at his early youth hood. That the youths should help their colleagues who have lost a sense of direction to become alcoholic and drug users to come back on the track as good citizens
Again the youngsters commended the Warioba commission and that it managed to capture ideas from a big section of the Tanzanians population. They condemned the focus on the formation of the union that has taken a confrontational stance and forgot other core national values. Hence noting that Ideological affiliation could destroy the prospects of the best document as it was anticipated.
They said that all youths should educate their cohorts on the importance of voting when it comes into voting also to use properly social media, face-book, twitter blogs and social networks like jamii forum, wanabidii, wanamabadiliko etc.
They said that the vote based on tyranny of numbers won’t bring a peoples constitution after having heard utterances which are being aired every now and then and that youths won’t allow this project to be hijacked and that soon after a new constitution, if it will not represent the people’s wishes at large they will launch a new movement for the same purpose of getting a people’s document.
Analysts in many circles have criticized the conduct of the process to get a new constitution on grounds that there was a serious mistake to allow politicians to hijack the process because it was definite that by allowing all parliamentarians’ to be part of this process there will be a “tyranny of numbers”.  
As it was speculated the tug of war in the formaulation of the new constitution has mainly centre on ideological affiliations sidelining other important stakeholders. Already the coalitions of the civil society on the constitution formulation and religious leaders have issues statements condemning the usurpation of the process by politicians and many other irregularities.
Religious leaders
For its part, the Interreligious Council for Peace Tanzania (IRCPT) issued a statement in spirit of rectifying the CA in Dodoma. This statement was of the representatives of different Faith   Based   Organizations   (FBOs), namely the Muslim Council of Tanzania (BAKWATA), the Christian Council of Tanzania (CCT), and the Pentecostal Churches of Tanzania (PCT).
Others are the Tanzania Asian Development Association (TADA), Tanzania Episcopal Conference (TEC), Tanzania Muslims Professionals Association (TAMPRO), Baha’s  Faith;  Ahmadiyya Jamaat, Buddhist Community,  Shia Ithnaasheri Community, and the Dar es Salaam Christian Women Wing.
Their statement followed the meetings of the representatives of these bodies on the 26th Day of March in 2014 under the auspices of Interreligious Council for Peace Tanzania (IRCPT) in collaboration with KAS to discuss and analyze the Draft Constitution.
Suggestions to be taken on board on the Constitution Draft includes adherence to the national values: dignity, patriotism, integrity, unity, transparency, accountability and the national language should be adhered to.
They sought for the improvement of Article 79 on qualifications for the presidential candidate to include the aspirant being married as one of the qualifications. Also they suggested that the Constitution should specify that marriage is between a man and a woman. 
Moreover these servants of God suggested that there should be a commission to track regularly the implementation of the Commission.  They also suggested that the        Constitution        should acknowledge the presence of God, and provide guidance on the equitable use of the national resources and tax collection.
They called for the Preventing and Combating Corruption   Bureau (PCCB), in the   list   of   accountability institutions, and that the Constitution should declare that the right to live begins when a child is conceived
They suggested this document to    declare that the right to health is a basic right to each citizen regardless of orientation, economic or social status. There was a call to ensure that any   agreement or relationship between a member state to the Union    and   any   third   party; should ensure the Union is not compromised in any way
And that in order to enhance accountability, the out-going president should no longer enjoy immunity to prosecution after leaving the office.
That the Constitution should strictly observe separation of powers between the three pillars: Legislative, Executive and Judiciary (e.g. Nomination of 5 Special Members of Parliament should not be done by the His Excellency the President; the attempts to justify
Furthermore it was suggested that any leader who has been dismissed or  forced  to  resign after  being proven to be in violation of leadership ethics; should neither be ever appointed to any leadership position nor be ever nominated to a leadership position

The Constitution should recognize the role to be played by a council of religious leaders and other community elders in advising the government on legislation, social and other sensitive national issues
That the Ethics Commission shall have the obligation to provide proof of integrity of any leader lined-up for election or nomination before other processes take-off.
In recognition  of the good work done by the Presidential Commission on Constitution Reform headed by Judge Joseph Sinde Warioba, and being mindful of the importance of the constitution in the day-to-day life of the people of Tanzania and; considering the huge cost involved in the whole process of writing a new constitution right from the beginning and;
Observing the  existence of politically aligned and politically manipulated debates, strong ideological based positions – at times in  disregard of  the  very standing  orders/ regulations agreed and passed by the same Constituent Assembly Members and;

Being aware of the expectations and intentions of Tanzanians to obtain a new constitution which shall be the beacon for the nation, and shall provide guidance in creation of God- fearing upright leaders who shall serve the people with humility, love and accountability; members of the IRCPT had this resolutions:
The     Constituent     Assembly Members should honour the Draft Constitution     and   should   work towards improving it with the view to obtain the proposed constitution bearing in mind that the draft is the reflection of the opinion of the people.
That the Constituent Assembly Members should fear God and this enable them to make decisions which shall be in tandem with the expectations of the people thus making the nation more productive.
A call from the civil society organizations
But while this was going the coalitions and networks of civil society organizations came up with a bold and strong statement in condemnation of the state machination of the Constituent Assembly.
Reading a statement on behalf of more than 500 Non Governmental Organizations (NGOs) dealing with human rights in various forms at the Legal and Human Rights Centre (LHRC), on Thursday this week was an ad hoc chairman of this umbrella body Mr Irenei Kiria, the Executive Director of Sikika an NGO dealing with health rights.
“While we are lauding President Kikwete for blessing the Constitution initiative but he erred in showing a biased approach based on ideological affiliation during his presentation” remarked Kiria.
He was supported by the LHRC Executive Director Dr Helen Kijo-Bisimba, Mr Deus Kibamba who is the chairman of the Constitutional Forum, and Mr Israel Ilunde the Executive Director, Youth Partnership Countrywide (YPC)  from Kibaha, Coast Region.
In general the CSOs condemned the usurpation of the constitution process, the closing of the CRC website, segregation and insults in the ongoing CA in Dodoma. The as well critiques President Kiwete’s speech during the opening of the CA and they were categorical that it has contributed a lot to the ongoing commotions in the House.  
Photo

Mr Humphrey Polepole former commissioner of the CRC presenting a paper on the constitutional process, on his left is Mr Richard Shaba-Team Leader KAS